Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Things you would have learned in school ...
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
wrhamb...@comcast.net  
View profile
 More options Jul 3, 11:53 pm
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur
From: wrhamb...@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:53:19 -0500
Local: Thurs, Jul 3 2008 11:53 pm
Subject: Things you would have learned in school ...
 ... had you been paying attention.

http://www.maniacworld.com/pitiful-answer-on-game-show.html

Nice try.  Your IQ does drop by 50% the minute you set foot
on stage unless you are an experienced performer.  I don't
feel too bad for Henri.

Bud


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
oriel36  
View profile
 More options Jul 4, 2:38 am
Newsgroups: sci.astro.amateur
From: oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 4 2008 2:38 am
Subject: Re: Things you would have learned in school ...
On Jul 3, 8:53 pm, wrhamb...@comcast.net wrote:

>  ... had you been paying attention.

> http://www.maniacworld.com/pitiful-answer-on-game-show.html

> Nice try.  Your IQ does drop by 50% the minute you set foot
> on stage unless you are an experienced performer.  I don't
> feel too bad for Henri.

> Bud

100% of people here believe Newton was right in respect to the
reasoning of Copernicus even though actual images show clearly that he
was incorrect -

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0112/JuSa2000_tezel.gif

"For to the earth planetary motions appear sometimes direct, sometimes
stationary, nay, and sometimes retrograde. But from the sun they are
always seen direct" Newton

The old astronomers watched as the planets appeared to stop and
temporarily go backwards,Copernicus recognised that this was due to
the Earth overtaking the outer planets (as in the time lapse footage
of Jupiter and Saturn above).There is no requirement for a
hypothetical observer on the Sun to account for retrogrades as we
resolve that apparent motion quite nicely once the orbitally moving
Earth is recognised and that we are moving with the orbitally moving
Earth.

The contestant on that game show is fine,this is what happens when
there are no astronomers around to explain to people what Copernicus
did and how he arrived at the conclusion that the Earth orbits the
central Sun wand how  axial rotation explains the daily cycle of day
and night.How many astronomers are there here who can matter of factly
just spot what is correct from what is not and deal with the matter in
an intelligent way for although that contestant can be excused for his
lack of astronomical knowledge of heliocentricity,there can be no
excuse for people here - none !.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google